
A clean-looking hood does not tell a restaurant operator what happened inside the duct or at the rooftop fan. The service record does. It shows when the kitchen exhaust system was inspected or cleaned, what areas were addressed, what could not be reached, and which deficiencies need follow-up. Keeping that information organized helps managers maintain the system and answer questions from fire officials, property managers, and other stakeholders.
A hood sticker is a quick reference not the whole story
A service label near the hood gives an at-a-glance record of the visit. IKECA guidance says a certificate of performance should identify the service date, company and person performing the work, areas not cleaned, and next service due date. But a label cannot describe every duct run, access limitation, or mechanical issue. Ask for the full system service report and keep it where managers can retrieve it.
The report should describe the entire exhaust path
The kitchen exhaust system extends beyond the visible canopy. The scope can include the hood, grease removal devices, ductwork, access panels, and exhaust fan. A report should identify which systems and components were cleaned and distinguish complete system cleaning from a limited hood service. IKECA advises restaurant owners to understand the duct route and obtain a written scope so the work purchased matches the system that needs attention.
Before-and-after images can make hidden conditions easier to review, particularly at access panels, vertical duct sections, and rooftop equipment. Images are most useful when they are labeled with the location and tied to the written report rather than presented as an unorganized collection of photos.
Exceptions and deficiencies are the most useful part
A good report does not simply say “cleaned.” It notes areas that were inaccessible or not cleaned and explains why. It should flag missing access, damaged components, fan issues, grease accumulation that needs further work, or other observed conditions outside the cleaning scope. IKECA specifically calls for a complete post-service report documenting mechanical issues, access problems, areas not cleaned, and safety concerns.
Assign each exception to an owner and a due date. Some items may require a mechanical contractor, roofer, or system modification before the cleaning contractor can finish the work. A service label alone should never hide an unresolved deficiency.
Records help set the next inspection and cleaning plan
Kitchen exhaust cleaning frequency depends on cooking volume and the condition found during inspection. A high-volume operation may need a different schedule from a lightly used kitchen. The report creates a history of grease accumulation, service dates, and repeat problem areas so the next interval can be reviewed with the contractor and the authority having jurisdiction. Avoid treating a suggested date on a sticker as a substitute for the applicable requirements and actual system condition.
Make records easy to find across shifts and locations
Keep the report, service label details, photos, invoices, deficiency follow-up, and next scheduled inspection together for each exhaust system. For a multi-location operator, use the same naming convention for site, hood, fan, and service date. A manager change should not erase the service history. These records help the next contractor understand prior access issues and help the operator show what was done and what remains open.
Ask for documentation as part of the service
Before scheduling, confirm that the proposal covers the complete intended exhaust path and specifies the post-service report and label you will receive. Advanced Air Duct Cleaning can discuss the cleaning scope, access needs, and documentation for your commercial kitchen exhaust system. Contact our team to plan service and a clear handoff to the people responsible for the kitchen.
0/5
(0 Reviews)